How People Voted
36% For, 64% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 3437, The Jackson Gulch Rehabilitation Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on July 16, 2008, 19:49:35 (webmaster), with revision saved on July 18, 2008, 19:47:49 (webmaster):
H.R. 3437 would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to carry out the Jackson Gulch rehabilitation project in the State of Colorado.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
Jackson Gulch Rehabilitation Act of 2007 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation: (1) to pay the federal share (80%) of the cost of carrying out the Jackson Gulch Rehabilitation Project in Colorado; and (2) in preparing any studies related to the Project, to use existing studies, including engineering and resource information provided by, or at the direction of, federal, state, or local agencies and the Mancos Water Conservancy District.
Makes the District responsible for the operation and maintenance of any facility constructed or rehabilitated under this Act.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
Latest Major Action: 7/15/2008:7/16/2008: House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
Bretta
July 29, 2008, 6:01pm (report abuse)The cost stated today seems minicule... but it is an ESTIMATE.
and no doubt I will be thought stingy, but it is these LITTLE(?)amounts that continually add up to BIG amounts. Is everything that's proposed really necessary? Or is it a congressman championing for re-election?
Martin
July 31, 2008, 8:50pm (report abuse)No offense to Coloradans, but I don't pay taxes to fix other states gulches.