What People Think
40% For, 60% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
![]() ![]() |
For |
![]() ![]() |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
![]() ![]() |
Comment on this Bill |
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 343, The Military Retiree Health Care Relief Act of 2007
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
No revisions found.
Learn More
Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_HR_343.html
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)











Visitor Comments
Tom Berenato
World War II & Korean Vetewrans were promised free lifetime medical care.
Being charged monthly Medicare premiums violates those government promises wtitings do exist & the point has even been admitted by gov.
Robert W Thompson
As a refundable credit, this would accomplish the same as waiving the Part"B" premium. It would require filing a tax return, which could be a chore for those who would not otherwise be required to file. But for $2244 (2007) for a couple, it would be worth it
Harold E. PINSON (USN-RET)
When I enlisted on 23 Oct 1956 - I was told that I would have total medical coverage by the local Navy Recuriter and that I would have complete medical care for myself and family if I stayed in the U. S. Navy for twenty years. I retired on 1 Mar 1976. The wife and I are both over 65 and paying $2244 for Part "B" Medicare Coverage that should come with my so called FREE medical coverage as promised in Oct of 1956. We are on a fix income and the $2244 would be a great asset to the both of us at this time.