Home

Blog

How People Voted

14% For, 86% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 3427, To prohibit the revocation of waivers of the competitive need limitation under the Generalized System of Preferences program unless certain conditions are met

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on November 16, 2007, 18:47:22 (webmaster), with revision saved on December 17, 2008, 07:51:11 (webmaster):

H.R. 3427 would prohibit the revocation of waivers of the competitive need limitation under the Generalized System of Preferences program unless certain conditions are met.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Amends the Trade Act of 1974 to prohibit the President from revoking any waiver of the competitive need limitation in effect, on or after June 20, 2007, with respect to an article from a beneficiary developing country under the Generalized System of Preferences program unless certain conditions are met.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 8/3/2007:8/9/2007: Referred to House committee.subcommittee. Status: Referred to the House CommitteeSubcommittee on Ways and Means.Trade.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Learn More

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)