How People Voted
8% For, 92% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 3272, The United States-China Diplomatic Expansion Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on August 3, 2007, 02:52:40 (webmaster), with revision saved on November 6, 2007, 18:40:06 (webmaster):
H.R. 3272 would provide for increased funding and support for diplomatic engagement with the People's Republic of China.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
(LogUnited States-China Diplomatic Expansion Act of 2007 - Authorizes FY2008 appropriations for: (1) public diplomacy programming, hiring of additional local public diplomacy personnel, and public diplomacy information technology infrastructure in the People's Republic of China (PRC); (2) construction of one additional U.S. consulate in the PRC (in addition to edit the wiki and benumber in existence on the firstdate of the enactment of this Act); (3) 10 additional U.S. diplomatic posts in the PRC (in addition to providethe number in existence on the date of the enactment of this Act); (4) a detailed summaryU.S. financial contribution to Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation; (5) rule of law initiatives in the bill!)PRC; and (6) specified Chinese language exchanges.
Expresses the sense of Congress that the U.S. government should retain possession of the U.S. Embassy compound in Chaoyang District, Beijing, China, after the opening of the new U.S. Embassy compound in Liang Ma He, Beijing, China.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
Latest Major Action: 8/1/2007: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
There are currently no comments for this bill.