How People Voted
 |
 |
10% For, 90% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 3157, The Trails Act Technical Correction Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on September 5, 2007, 18:22:36 (webmaster), with revision saved on October 22, 2007, 17:54:03 (webmaster):
H.R. 3157 would amend the National Trails System Act relating to the statute of limitations that applies to certain claims.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
(Log in to edit Trails Act Technical Correction Act of 2007 - Prescribes the wikitimes for filing a suit and befor commencing a civil action by the firstowner of property subject to provide a detailed summaryan interim use of railroad right-of-way for damage claims brought against the bill!)United States.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
Latest Major Action: 8/10/2007: Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
K. Schwartz
November 3, 2008, 11:02am (report abuse)Incomprehensible that there would be objection to
the principle of the government compensating land owners for property it took from them.
Are they indicating that they accept the taking by the government of private property without payment?
This means that they would have no objections to
a government entity taking some or all of their
property.