Home

Blog

How People Voted

12% For, 88% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 3111, The Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memorial Enhancement Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on March 5, 2008, 19:29:54 (webmaster), with revision saved on May 14, 2008, 19:49:26 (webmaster):

H.R. 3111 would provide for the administration of Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memorial as a unit of the National Park System.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memorial Enhancement Act of 20072008 - Amends the Port Chicago National Memorial Act of 1992 to require the Secretary of the Interior to administer the Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memorial as a unit of the National Park System.

Directs the Secretary of Defense, whenever such Secretary determines that specified landDefense to transfer a parcel of land, consisting of approximately five acres, within the proposed boundary on the map entitled &quot;Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memorial, Proposed Boundary&quot;,Boundary,&quot; dated August 2005, is excess to military needs, to transfer such land to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior. Interior if: (1) the land is excess to military needs; and (2) all environmental remediation actions necessary to respond to environmental contamination related to the land have been completed in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 and other applicable laws.

InstructsAuthorizes the Secretary of Defense, as part of such land transfer,the Interior to perform all environmental remediation actions necessary to respond to environmental contamination attributableenter into an agreement with the city of Concord, California, and the East Bay Regional Park District to former military activities onestablish and operate a facility for visitor orientation and parking, administrative offices, and curatorial storage for the property. Memorial.

AuthorizesExpresses the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the InteriorDefense, in order to enter into an agreement with the City of Concord, California, andfacilitate the East Bay Regional Park Districtland transfer under this Act, should promptly remediate remaining environmental contamination related to establish and operate a facility for visitor orientation and parking, administrative offices, and curatorial storage for the Memorial. land.

Expresses the sense of Congress,Congress that, in order to preserve the Memorial for future generations, that the Secretaries of Defense and the Interior should work together to: (1) repair storm damage to the Port Chicago site; and (2) develop a process by which future repairs and necessary modifications to the site can be achieved in as timely and cost-effective a manner as possible.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 3/4/2008: Passed/agreed3/5/2008: Referred to in House.Senate committee. Status: On motion to suspendReceived in the rulesSenate and pass the bill, as amended AgreedRead twice and referred to by voice vote.the Committee on Armed Services.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)