Home

Blog

How People Voted

6% For, 94% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 3097, To condition the transfer of personnel and functions from Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, pursuant to the base closure process

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on August 15, 2007, 18:34:50 (webmaster), with revision saved on October 22, 2007, 17:54:41 (webmaster):

H.R. 3097 would condition the transfer of personnel and functions from Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, pursuant to the base closure process.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log inProhibits either the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the Army from funding the transfer of personnel or functions from Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, pursuant to edit the wikirecommendations of the Defense Base Closure and beRealignment Commission under the first to provideDefense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, until at least 30 days after the Comptroller General completes an audit of a detailed summaryreport of the bill!)Secretary of Defense stating that: (1) such transfer to Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, will be accomplished without disruption of their support to the Global War on Terror or other critical contingency operations; and (2) safeguards exist to mitigate potential degradation of such support and ensure maximum retention of critical workforce.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 8/14/2007: Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Readiness.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)