How People Voted
 |
 |
49% For, 51% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 2780, To amend section 8339(p) of title 5, United States Code, to clarify the method for computing certain annuities under the Civil Service Retirement System which are based on part-time service, and for other purposes
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Kathy Smith
March 19, 2008, 8:56pm (report abuse)Very few employees knew how being on a part-time schedule would effect their retirement calculation when they retired. I was part-time for 9 years after 1986. Once it was explained how it affected my retirement, I immediately went full-time. The damage was done at that point.
Walter Rapka Jr
May 11, 2008, 11:11am (report abuse)This bill will save the Federal Government money in the long run when it comes to BRAC and training replacement people. This will reduce PCS costs for the government and reduce the emotional impact of not having to move during the last 3 years of CSRS service. The quick passage of this bill will save millions in training costs and improve the performance of future govenment employees.
Ed Katz
June 17, 2008, 1:30pm (report abuse)CSRS is based on "high 3" and length of service. If this bill passes does it mean that the length of service will reflect part-time BUT the average pay will be AS IF the work was full-time??
Is this correct?