What People Think
 |
 |
46% For, 54% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
  |
For |
  |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
  |
Comment on this Bill |
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 2567, The Medicare Home Infusion Therapy Coverage Act of 2007
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_HR_2567.html
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Larry Cowan
This legislation makes so much sense. It is insane the we want to put people in the hospital when they can be treated in the home with high levels of quality and much lower costs. My patients deserve better.
Christie Kerr
I have an MS client who lives in a rural area and is using Home Infusion drugs but must struggle to administer them herself. She must pay 100% out of pocket. This makes no sense.
Pass this legislation.
Jerry Kramer MD
I agree with the above comments. When does healthcare become about the patient and not about the beauractic process. I heard that there is now Senate legislation. Hopefully we will start seeing progress in helping to ensure that seniors get appropriate care.
Ilene Fields
I have been following this issue. Does anyone know what the AARP position is on this legislation. They should be the strongest advocates.