How People Voted
38% For, 62% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 1650, The Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)





Visitor Comments
Robert Hodgson
December 16, 2008, 8:31pm (report abuse)Until such a time as railroad ton/mile rates no longer are less than Interstate Trucking ton/mile rates then the railroads should be left alone. Interstate Trucking is heavily subsidized through the building and repair of our interstate and highway network. Yet there are over 550,000 accidents/yr. involving a large truck. 1 in every 9 highway deaths are the result of an accident involving a large truck.
Better we subsidize an expanded rail network