How People Voted
34% For, 66% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 1497, The Legal Timber Protection Act
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)





Visitor Comments
M.S.
April 28, 2008, 4:21pm (report abuse)We need this bill to perserve foreign habitats and to help the timber bussiness in the United States where the laws are inforced ,in the global market.
JD509000
June 28, 2008, 11:31pm (report abuse)I agree the bill should pass, however amendments are needed. I'm confused on how they plan to keep track of what's legal and illegal timber. All timber should be legal but how can we track this?
HE
August 7, 2008, 4:18am (report abuse)By using an online tracking service such as that provided by HistoricFutures.com
BP
September 26, 2008, 10:14pm (report abuse)I see this Bill as extremely harmful to the timber industry of the United States. The regulatory and compliance actions that will be needed by numerous companies within the United States to comply with this Bill would be counter productive.