How People Voted
46% For, 54% Against
62 votes cast
Take Action
![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Organize | |
![]() |
Start A Petition |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 1464, The Great Cats and Rare Canids Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)



Visitor Comments
Melissa4PETA
September 19, 2007, 2:34pm (report abuse)Hi!
I'm a bit confused about this particular Bill. Specifically, why 50% of those who chose to vote on this, voted AGAINST this Bill. Could someone--anyone--explain what the Cons of this Bill could possibly be? I'm new to this website and politics, so please forgive me if I sound naive. I am, but I want to learn
Thank You:)
Melissa
william j barkley
May 6, 2008, 12:32pm (report abuse)I hope this bill passes and is signed. These 72 species are the world's responsibility;for they are found in virtually every country, or were until recently.