What People Think
 |
 |
34% For, 66% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
  |
For |
  |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
  |
Comment on this Bill |
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 1320, The Interference Protection for Existing Television Band Devices Act of 2007
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_HR_1320.html
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Ronald Streicher
Please add my voice to the concern regarding the "white space" issue:
I own and operate a system of fourteen wireless microphone systems in the UA frequency band (780-806 MHz). This reallocation of the broadcast "white space" will force me to spend several thousands of dollars to convert all of my equipment (44 units in all) in order to avoid interference from the new devices that will be occupying this spectrum. As a sole-proprietor and small business, this is an expense I can ill afford: it will take a very long time to recover.
Unless something is done to modify the FCC plan, this spectrum change will have a disastrous effect on all users of wireless microphones. In that event, I urge the Congress to establish a special fund to provide financial assistance to small business operators to help defray the significant costs this will impose. After all, we are being forced into this situation by an act of our government.
Sincerely,
Ronald Streicher