How People Voted
44% For, 56% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 1117, The REAL ID Repeal and Identification Security Enhancement Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on April 12, 2007, 18:38:20 (timsparapani), with revision saved on April 12, 2007, 18:40:26 (timsparapani):
H.R. 1117 would repeal title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005 and reinstitute section 7212 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which provides States additional regulatory flexibility and funding authorization to more rapidly produce tamper- and counterfeit-resistant driver's licenses and protects privacy and civil liberties by providing interested stakeholders on a negotiated rulemaking with guidance to achieve improved 21st century licenses to improve national security.
== Detailed Summary ==
Initially introduced in the waning hours of the 109th Congress as S. 4177, by Senators Daniel Akaka (D-HI) and John Sununu (R-NH), the Identification Security Enhancement Act seeks to replace the unworkable, rigid Title II of the REAL ID Act, Public Law 109-13, with a licensing system that states can actually implement. To that end, the Identification Security Enhancement Act essentially reinstates Section 7212 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which was repealed by REAL ID, and provides states with additional regulatory flexibility and funding authorization to more rapidly produce tamper- and counterfeit-resistant driver’s licenses. The Identification Security Enhancement Act also builds in statutory protections for personal privacy and civil liberties.
Section 1.
* Provides that Act may be cited as the Identification Security Enhancement Act.
Section 2.
* Replaces Title II of the REAL ID Act with amended statutory language as set forth in the Identification Security Enhancement Act.
Section 3.
* Provides definitions for terms.
* Limits a Federal Agency’sAgency's ability to accept a noncompliant state license issued more than two years after negotiated rule makers convened under the Identification Security Enhancement Act promulgate minimum licensing standards and those standards are issued by the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”).("DHS").
* Requires all states to be in full conformance with the minimum licensing standards by five years after their issuance and provides the Secretary of DHS with the authority to waive that date if the Secretary determines that it is impracticable for states to comply.
* Requires states to periodically certify their compliance to the Secretary of DHS, and permits audits by DHS of that compliance.
* Requires that the minimum standards issued by DHS include standards for: (i) documentation showing proof of identity; (ii) verifiability of documents produced to obtain a license; (iii) application processing to prevent fraud; (iv) information to be contained on the face of the card; (v) a machine readable zone on the card; (vi) security to ensure licenses are tamper- and counterfeit resistant and will protect the security of a unique identifier; and (vii) requiring states to confiscate comprised licenses.
* Establishes a negotiated rulemaking committee pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 561, et seq. Negotiated Rulemakers are required to provide their recommendations to the Secretary of DHS no later than nine months after enactment of the Identification Security Enhancement Act. The Secretary of DHS must also issue a final rule responding to those recommendations not later than 1 year after enactment of the Act.
* Allocates representation on the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee to interested stakeholders including representatives of the state licensing offices, state elected officials, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and those with expertise in protecting privacy, civil liberties, constitutional rights and immigration law.
* Sets contours for some of the recommendations to be created by the Negotiated Rulemakers
* Creates grants for states and a formula for allocating grant funds
* Allows the Secretary of DHS to extend the date of full conformance by up to two years for any state if the Secretary deems that state to have made reasonable efforts to comply with the minimum standards issued.
Section 4.
Authorizes the Secretary of DHS to appropriate up to $300 million per annum for each of the fiscal years 2007 through 2013 to carry out the Identification Security Enhancement Act.
== Status of the Legislation ==
Currently has 19 House co-sponsors and has been referred to both the House Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight & Government Reform Committee.
== Points in Favor ==
Provides a realistic solution to the Real ID nightmare by replacing the unworkable Title II of the Real ID Act with a negotiated process that brings all interested stakeholders together to redesign state driver's licenses. That negotiated process would eliminate constitutional and privacy concerns that plague the Real ID Act.
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
DAVIS
March 14, 2007, 11:07am (report abuse)THIS IS A TERRIBLE LAW WHICH WAS SLIPPED IN WITH DEFENSE BILL . THIS IS NOTHING BUT TOTAL SLAVERY BY THE GOVT.THEY DONT NEED TO TRACK IT'S CITIZENS EVERYWHERE THEY GO.IT'S 666 READ REVE.13VER.17,18.
T. Allen
March 14, 2007, 5:45pm (report abuse)Davis, just so your clear, and so is everyone else reading this: This bill would *repeal* REAL ID, which I agree is the mark of the Beast and a frontal assault on our American values. I support this bill and everyone should vote FOR it!
Francia PA
August 18, 2007, 11:55pm (report abuse)No Way this is not a good bill!
Way too much control and getting us ready for the North American Union. America Better wake up and really read the bills that are being sliped by us all.
T. Allen
September 28, 2007, 10:57am (report abuse)Hey Francia - this is a *good* bill. It *repeals* REAL ID. Don't you think?
wwb
October 13, 2007, 4:10pm (report abuse)Read the bill. If you are for illegal immigration and open borders, then support this bill. It essentially takes out the provisions of the first Real ID Act that would require States to identify you as a US citizen before you get an ID card or driver’s license.
wwb
October 13, 2007, 4:46pm (report abuse)Typical, not to include the problematic sections in the summary. Here it is below.
4) CONTENT OF REGULATIONS- The regulations required by subsection (b)(2)--
(B) may not infringe on a State's power to set criteria concerning what categories of individuals are eligible to obtain a driver's license or personal identification card from that State;
(C) may not require a State to comply with any such regulation that conflicts with or otherwise interferes with the full enforcement of State criteria concerning the categories of individuals that are eligible to obtain a driver's license or personal identification card from that State;
(K) shall neither permit nor require verification of birth certificates until a nationwide system is designed to facilitate such verification.
In section K you can be sure that the federal Gov. will never have a national system to facilitate verification.
Brandon
January 15, 2008, 8:23pm (report abuse)wwb, the fact that it states in sec. K that the federal shall not permit nor require verification of birth certificates simply means that the federal gov't won't. The states will have all authority in that respect, which is how it should be.
Deb
February 8, 2008, 10:59pm (report abuse)Hmmm, that's the trouble with these bills, sometimes they sound great. I would like it better if it said, NO REAL ID. period. '(K) shall neither permit nor require verification of birth certificates until a nationwide system is designed to facilitate such verification.' Teh key word is 'until'. Seems to be just stalling because REAL id is costing taxpayers too much, the states cant handle it.
Deb
February 8, 2008, 11:08pm (report abuse)PS - It does appear to give back the power to the states, which is better.
JAMES
April 29, 2008, 10:41am (report abuse)This is a "good bill" in the sense that it is handing power back to the states where it belongs. Call me what you will, but I don't believe REAL ID was introduced to control so called "terrorism". It's roots seem more Orwellian and reeks of Fascism. Real ID's potential to be abused and used as a means of control by our so called Government should have every American citizen doing a double take on this. No state, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE should accept REAL ID and set a precedence. It was not introduced to "protect" the American citizen. It will ultimately end up being used to control us.