Home

Blog

How People Voted

22% For, 78% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 1084, The Reconstruction and Stabilization Civilian Management Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on March 8, 2008, 19:48:30 (webmaster), with revision saved on May 14, 2008, 19:56:28 (webmaster):

H.R. 1084 would amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, and the Foreign Service Act of 1980 to build operational readiness in civilian agencies.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Reconstruction and Stabilization Civilian Management Act of 2007 - States that the purpose of this Act is<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to provide for the development, as a core missionHouse on March 4, 2008. The summary of the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), of an expert civilian response capability to carry out stabilization and reconstruction activities in a country or region that version is in, or is in transition from, conflict or civil strife.repeated here.)</b>

AmendsReconstruction and Stabilization Civilian Management Act of 2008 - (Sec. 4) Amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to authorize the PresidentPresident, if in the U.S. national interest, to furnish assistance and permit the export of goods and services to assist in stabilizing and reconstructing a country or region that is in, or is in transition from, conflict or civil strife. Requires specified pre-notification by the President before making assistance available.

Amends the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to establish within the Department an Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization. Authorizes:Limits: (1) the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of USAID,program authority to establish a Response Readiness Corps to provide stabilization and reconstruction activities in foreign countries or regions that are at risk, in, or are in transition from, conflict or civil strife (up to 250 personnel to serve in the Corps, and such other personnel as the Secretary may designate from the Department and USAID);FY2008-FY2010; and (2) the Secretary to establish a Response Readiness Reserve of federal and non-federal personnel (at least 500 nonfederal personnel which may include federal retirees)annual fiscal year expenditures to augment the Corps.$100 million.

Amend(Sec. 5) Amends the Foreign ServiceState Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to authorizeestablish within the Secretary, in cooperation with the SecretaryDepartment of Defense and the SecretariesState an Office of the Navy and Army, to establish a stabilization and reconstruction curriculumCoordinator for use in programs of the Foreign Service Institute, the National Defense University,Reconstruction and the United States Army War College. Stabilization.

Sets forth related personnel provisions.Office functions.

Authorizes the Secretary of State to establish: (1) a Response Readiness Corps (containing an active and standby component consisting of trained U.S. government personnel, including Department and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) employees) to provide stabilization and reconstruction activities in foreign countries or regions that are at risk, in, or are in transition from, conflict or civil strife; and (2) a volunteer Civilian Reserve Corps (authorizes such individuals' employment and training). Authorizes FY2007-FY2010 appropriations.

Prohibits the establishment and deployment of any Civilian Reserve Corps from substantively impairing state and local capacity and readiness.

Directs the Secretary to ensure the use of existing Department and USAID training and education programs.

(Sec. 6) Authorizes: (1) the Secretary or the head of any U.S. agency, with respect to agency personnel, to extend to any individual assigned or deployed under this Act certain death gratuity, training, and travel benefits that are provided to Foreign Service members; and (2) the Secretary to accept detailees or assignments from other agencies and state or local employees on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis.

(Sec. 7) Directs the Secretary to develop an interagency strategy to respond to reconstruction and stabilization operations.

Sets forth strategy contents.

(Sec. 8) Directs the Secretary to report annually (for six years) to the appropriate congressional committees respecting implementation of this Act.

Sets forth report requirements.

</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 3/7/2008: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 609.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Learn More

From the Blog

The “Coburn Omnibus” - 36 Bills in One!

Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma didn’t come to Washington, D.C. to grow the government. A long time critic of federal spending and power, he has made prolific use of “holds” to prevent legislation he doesn’t like fr...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

MHP

July 28, 2008, 3:30pm (report abuse)

So am I to understand, based upon the opposition to this provision being similar in degree to the opposition to the war in Iraq, that the issue is entirely fiscal and selfishly motivated, and not at all based upon moral objections? Or might I go further, to say that the support for the invasion that lead to thousands of civilian deaths is greater than the desire of persons to give up US$2 to help clean up some of the messes U.S. foreign policy has previously exacerbated?

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)