Home

Blog

How People Voted

22% For, 78% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H. Con. Res. 220, Concerning the response of the United States to forced abortion and the coercive one-child policy in the People's Republic of China, and the resulting "gendercide" of girls in that country

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on March 14, 2008, 02:50:13 (webmaster), with revision saved on March 14, 2008, 02:50:13 (webmaster):

H. Con. Res. 220 concerns the response of the United States to forced abortion and the coercive one-child policy in the People's Republic of China, and to the resulting "gendercide" of girls in that country.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(LogDeclares that Congress strongly condemns the continued violations of human rights by the government of the People's Republic of China (PRC), including regarding birth limitations and related forced abortions and sterilization.

Urges the PRC government to cease these policies and urges the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) to cease all its activities
in the PRC and withdraw from that country.

Affirms certain internationally recognized human rights, including the right of women
to editbear children unconstrained by government policies limiting the wikinumber of children they bear and be the firstright of children not to providebe discriminated against by a detailed summarygovernment because they were born contrary to a government plan.

Asks that the President and the Secretary
of State raise these concerns with the bill!)PRC government, call upon the PRC government to cease immediately these policies, and continue to withhold funds from UNFPA due to UNFPA's continued involvement in supporting coercive abortion and sterilization, which violates the &quot;Kemp-Kasten&quot; provision of U.S. law.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 9/27/2007: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Learn More

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)