http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills info@washingtonwatch.com http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1 http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1940.html?rev=21940 <p>S. 1940 would reauthorize the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <h2 id="toc0"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program Reauthorization Act - Amends the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to: (1) include representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the Rio Puerco Management Committee; and (2) authorize appropriations for the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc1"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 4/10/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 654.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc2"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc3"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 21940@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:59:13 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1940.html?rev=20615 <p>S. 1940 would reauthorize the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <h2 id="toc4"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program Reauthorization Act - Amends the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to: (1) include representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the Rio Puerco Management Committee; and (2) authorize appropriations for the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc5"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 1/30/2008: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc6"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc7"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 20615@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:18:53 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1940.html?rev=9154 <p>S. 1940 would reauthorize the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <h2 id="toc8"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program Reauthorization Act - Amends the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to: (1) include representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the Rio Puerco Management Committee; and (2) authorize appropriations for the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc9"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 9/20/2007: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Date of scheduled hearing. SD-366. 2:30 p.m.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc10"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc11"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 9154@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:47:32 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1940.html?rev=8685 <p>S. 1940 would reauthorize the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <h2 id="toc12"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc13"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 9/20/2007: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Date of scheduled hearing. SD-366. 2:30 p.m.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc14"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc15"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 8685@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:51:38 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1940.html?rev=8005 <p>S. 1940 would reauthorize the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <h2 id="toc16"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc17"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to update the status of the bill!)</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc18"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc19"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 8005@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:11:40 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1940.html?rev=8006 <p>S. 1940 would reauthorize the Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.</p> <h2 id="toc20"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc21"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 8/2/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc22"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc23"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 8006@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:11:40 EDT