See Related Bills:
See Bills on the Same Subject:
Appropriations, Armed forces, Authorization, Biennial budgets, Budget deficits, Budget resolutions, Budget surpluses, Budgets, Central Intelligence Agency, Civil service retirement, Coast guard, Congress, Congressional budget, Congressional committees (House), Congressional committees (Senate), Congressional publicity, Congressional reporting requirements, Congressional voting, Debt limit, Defense policy, Department of Commerce, Economic policy, Emergency management, Entitlements, Expedited congressional procedure, Families, Federal advisory bodies, Federal budget process, Federal budgets, Federal employees, Finance, Foreign policy, Foreign service, Fraud, Government employees, Government insurance, Government spending reductions, Government trust funds, Grants-in-aid, Health policy, House Budget, House of Representatives, House rules and procedure, Income tax, Indexing (Economic policy), Intelligence activities, Intelligence services, Item veto, Legislation, Medical care, Medicine, Members of Congress, Military dependents, Military pensions, Old age, survivors and disability insurance, Pensions, Presidents, Public health personnel, Rescission of appropriated funds, Retiree health benefits, Senate Budget, Senate rules and procedure, Social security, Subsidies, Survivors' benefits, Tariff, Tax expenditures, Tax incentives, Tax preferences, Taxation, Veterans' medical care, Waste in government spending (more subjects ↓)
See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
N/A
Visitor Comments
Dragonish
Too much crammed into one bill in an attempt to get something distasteful passed by covering it with sugar (line item veto). Changes the statutory limit for public debt? Doesn't sound like a protection for my family budget. Better that Congress require itself to limit a bill to one issue at a time, thus allowing for greater understanding of its implications, so as to promote an informed citizenry.