<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for S. 66, A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such aircraft</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by ghostrider189 (November 11, 2009, 19:40:43)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_66.html#134041</link>
<description>Would this not be a grea tbill to pass,As we have a a budget that allows no monies to get to places 
we can only dream about from inside a house ?????? i say 
&quot;YOU GO BILL&quot;...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">134041@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:40:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RONNIE STEPHENS (August 15, 2009, 09:58:17)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_66.html#64442</link>
<description>THIS IS A GOOD BILL WE HAVE TO BE VERY MINDFUL.EVERY DISABLED VETERAN WANT BE ABLED TO USE THE SERVICE BECAUSE OF LIMITATIONS....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">64442@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:58:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RONNIE STEPHENS (August 15, 2009, 09:53:58)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_66.html#64441</link>
<description>I SUPPORT THIS BILL IF THIS BILL WAS PASS.I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GO TO MY NIECE FUNERAL.WHO WAS STATION IN COLORADO SPRINGS.SHE WAS AN MP IN THE AIR FORCE.BUT LIVE IN MARIANNAS ISLAND SAIPAN....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">64441@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:53:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lawrence Reeves (June 20, 2009, 03:58:47)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_66.html#60957</link>
<description>Given the number who may travael this benefit could be extended to all Disabled Vetrans with 30% or more.  Again the cost would be minimal considering the value of service given by the veterans....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">60957@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:58:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joyce Moore (May 26, 2009, 12:54:11)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_66.html#59501</link>
<description>I support this bill and hope it passes, it would make life a lot easier for myself and fellow disabled veterans to keep in touch with their families and be there for our families when their military members deploy. Please pass this bill, so that we can still support the military mission....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">59501@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:54:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bryant Wall (March 22, 2009, 23:12:29)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_66.html#54281</link>
<description>I am in favor for this Bill and feel that it should be part of 100% Total and Permanent Disabled Veterans Compensation benefits.  Please pass this Bill....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">54281@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:12:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by J Cripps (January 30, 2009, 11:38:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_66.html#50140</link>
<description>No....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">50140@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:38:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		