<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for S. 1257, The District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2007</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Repeal 16-17 (December 21, 2007, 22:46:42)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1257.html#25164</link>
<description>This bill, if it became law, would clearly be Unconstitutional (see Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution).  So enacting this bill into a law would be a wasted effort.  If D.C. is to get voting representation in either House of the Congress, a Constitutional amendment, statehood, or retrocession must occur....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25164@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:46:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by KYJurisDoctor (July 30, 2007, 13:32:59)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1257.html#18174</link>
<description>If it passes constitutional muster, which it CANNOT without a constitutional amendment, then fine. Having said that, let me say that it violates all civilized notions of representative government to deny a group of people the right to elect their representatives.

http://OsiSpeaks.com or http://OsiSpeaks.org...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18174@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:32:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		