<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for P.L. 110-317, The Hubbard Act</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Martin (July 31, 2008, 22:11:13)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_PL_110-317.html#39677</link>
<description>Why do these &quot;sole survivors&quot; have to be discharged?  Why can't they just get an instant transfer to the military installation of their choice?  I do feel for the families that have lost all but one child to military service and the remaining child should be taken out of harms way.  I don't think it is fair though, that these individuals would get the same benefits as those who stay to full term at their own peril.  

Special treatment, no free pass....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">39677@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:11:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		