<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for P.L. 110-180, The NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by John Roane (January 14, 2008, 11:01:42)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_PL_110-180.html#28486</link>
<description>Dear Americans:

This bill takes away several of American Veteran’s US Constitutional Rights.  If the rights of American Veterans, who fought, bleed, and died for The US Constitution can be taken your rights are next....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28486@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:01:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Veteran (October 1, 2007, 13:44:02)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_PL_110-180.html#21896</link>
<description>Look closely Amairka; The real purpose of this bill is to provide the Fourth Reich the ability to rubber-stamp the disarmament of combat Veterans, who by the way have no history of gun abuse any greater than the normal cross-section of our society.  Go research what purpose the Stryker vehicles and the Boeing 747 aerial sprayer are specifically designed for;  That should wake the public up to what's going on with the Fourth Reich shoring up for Patriot reaction to their evermore increasing fascist agenda. It should wake the public up but won't because the vast majority have been dumbed down to the point of not caring.  Who's gonna defend the public from the Fourth Reich if it isn't our combat Veterans?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21896@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:44:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian (August 7, 2007, 18:57:44)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_PL_110-180.html#18471</link>
<description>I too find it disturbing that the NRA so vehemently supports this bill, especially since I am a member. I don't understand what was wrong with the NICS in the first place, other than the fact that it is (though some would argue this point with me) a form of gun control. Any kind of regulation on firearms is a step towards an eventual ban. After all Janet Reno once said: &quot;Waiting periods are a step, registration is a step, the prohibition of privately owned firearms is the goal.&quot;...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18471@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:57:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Saint Jimi (June 22, 2007, 05:28:01)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_PL_110-180.html#16587</link>
<description>An armed society never takes this sort of thing laying down.  And no government ever lasted by disarming its people.  Ours is well on its way (in a hurry) to being replaced wholesale....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16587@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:28:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HBB (June 20, 2007, 04:48:22)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_PL_110-180.html#16520</link>
<description>It's unfortunate and unwise that the National Rifle Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation both back this bill, which will do nothing but further convolute the National Instant Check System -- an abortion in itself.

The Brady Bill is nothing more than feel-good nonsense and is arguably unconstitutional. It should never have been passed.

Criminals don't buy guns legally -- they steal them or get them through the black market....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16520@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:48:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		