<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 6257, The Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by enabled veteran (January 7, 2009, 05:35:26)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#48053</link>
<description>Hey, me again, just read the appendix, and thought they should change the name of the bill to the &quot;redneck&quot; rifle ban. For Gods sake! They have litterally got hunting rifles listed on there! Bolt action rifles! What next? Muzzleloaders? Airsoft? How about worrying about something a little more important, like poverty, disease, over-spending, border patrol, etc, etc.... Morons!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">48053@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:35:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by enabled veteran (January 7, 2009, 05:23:09)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#48052</link>
<description>It's almost as though, they are afraid of their own people, afraid we will finally lose it, and make them pay. I for one am sick and tired of my government telling me weather or not I can defend myself, and want them all out! I wish I could call this communism, but look at their paychecks! I am seriously worried about what their plans are after this apocalyptic act on society is complete, what are they planning to do next? First this, then the chip, then what? I hope they are ready for another kind of civil, or should I say, uncivil war in this country. For every one man left unarmed in this country, there will be ten of our enemies armed, what to do then? Self inflicted contraband chaos rebellion, and they think they will actually get away with it.... LMFAO!!!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">48052@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:23:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike (January 5, 2009, 21:03:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#48029</link>
<description>They can go f**k themseleves.I will not give up one gun....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">48029@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:03:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phil Justice (January 5, 2009, 14:14:50)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#48017</link>
<description>More useless infringement upon constitutionally protected God given rights. The vast majority of gun owners are die hard american patriots, not criminals. The first ban didn't do anything to reduce crime, the result of this one if implemented will be the same....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">48017@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:14:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vernon (January 4, 2009, 20:32:19)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47999</link>
<description>The time has come to nurish the tree of liberty....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47999@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:32:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by LEE (January 4, 2009, 20:25:56)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47998</link>
<description>Who amoung us will be the first pick a fight?  Until we fight, they'll do anything they want....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47998@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:25:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by AK-47 ROUNDS 4U (January 4, 2009, 00:01:28)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47992</link>
<description>ILL GIVE YOU MY GUNS 3000 ROUNDS FIRST!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47992@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:01:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JFK (January 3, 2009, 12:32:23)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47987</link>
<description>Just this morning on the news was a story of how violent crime, especially firearm crime was down in America. And if the elected even consider this bill with all the other issues impacting our country we need to remind them VERY LOUDLY that they are supposed to work for US, not against us.  And as our employees they should be working on the truely pressing issues of our econimic collapse, runaway spending, energy, war in Iraq and Afganistan, and the middleast issue that has raised it's head again.  CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND REMIND THEM WHO THEY WORK FOR!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47987@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 11:32:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jason (January 2, 2009, 23:10:42)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47971</link>
<description>Part II...

The end result of the non-sense is that law abiding citizens and gun owners are going to be punished for the ignorance of our government.  Criminals are not going to care about this ban or any other ban because they will have the resources to go around it.  The government needs to quit tying our hands behind our backs and let us have our Constitutional Right to Bear Arms!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47971@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:10:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jason (January 2, 2009, 23:10:12)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47970</link>
<description>Politicians do not care about the typical American citizen because they are not one.  Politicians don’t have to worry about the average criminal vandalizing or breaking into their vehicles or homes.  They live in areas that are upscale, low crime areas, have security guards and so on.  They are not typical Americans in the least bit, but they make laws for us to follow.  It’s hypocrisy.

The President-Elect whom I did not vote for thinks that by banning “assault” rifles and various semi-automatic rifles and handguns that crime will be the thing of the past.  Maybe in his small world it will be, but not the typical American’s world.  Statistically “assault” weapons have the smallest percentage of use in crime.  Like some others have said on the forum, they are too hard to conceal – which is true.  They certainly cost more than the average pistol which is easily placed into a pocket or under a coat....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47970@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:10:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris (January 2, 2009, 13:43:07)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47960</link>
<description>The bill, and any bill like it, would be a disgrace. We Americans like our guns and liberties, GET OVER IT! If politicians are so afraid of us common folk owning weapons...maybe they should actually do their JOB and quit making everyone mad at them!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47960@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:43:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ohio Gun Owner (January 2, 2009, 01:20:56)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47949</link>
<description>You really don't want to be re-elected do you?  Shotguns are to protect our homes, handguns are to protect ourselves, and &quot;assault&quot; weapons are to defend from our hand guns and shotguns from being taken by the communists in Washington.   (the ones who sponsored this bill)   Why don't you write a bill to ban the CIA -- their the ones smuggling the drugs into the country.  Google &quot;CIA Drugs&quot;....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47949@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:20:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ok gun (January 1, 2009, 20:49:09)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47947</link>
<description>It's getting clearer to see how lefty's think when you see them protesting Israel's act of protecting themselves from attacks and they say nothing against the aggressors ( shame on those of us that would shoot a person breaking into your home to do you harm ) I give up on stupid people that think that way. May they regret their way of thinking in the future....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47947@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:49:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jackie boy (January 1, 2009, 19:51:35)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47944</link>
<description>Just remember....when they come for your guns, your supposed to give them the ammunition first !...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47944@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:51:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by wohalliburton (December 31, 2008, 16:56:10)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47919</link>
<description>The second amendment states &quot;The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed&quot;.  If you want to follow the Constitution the decision on this bill is easy.  But, our legislators don't want to follow the Constitution...they say its a 'flexible document'.  That is, the Constitution says what they want it to say.  Translate &quot;don't you worry your little head, we know what's best for you&quot;.  That's another big step towards tyranny. Vote out every legislator that votes for this treasonous bill....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47919@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:56:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by LouisCipher (December 29, 2008, 21:13:05)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47868</link>
<description>Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any semiautomatic assault weapon otherwise lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of the enactment of this subsection.

Means that if you already own it, you get to keep it, and if it makes you feel any better, the AK you spent $400 on six months ago would be worth thousands.

Would I give up my &quot;Assault Weapons&quot;?  No.  Should these so-called &quot;Assault Weapons&quot; be banned?  Hell No.

Hopefully these legislators will realise that if possession of guns is criminal, then only criminals will possess guns....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47868@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:13:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Halo (December 29, 2008, 01:20:29)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47836</link>
<description>If guns cause crime, then matches cause arson!  Protection of ones life is each person's responsibility!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47836@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:20:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by reloader54 (December 28, 2008, 21:17:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47833</link>
<description>hey 'O' bumf**k; if your black ass wants my guns then i invite you to kiss my white *ss cause you ain't getting them....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47833@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:17:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by reloader54 (December 28, 2008, 16:14:30)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47826</link>
<description>hold on to every weapon you own until we're all standing tall.reload until you can't afford it anymore and get ready to kick some ass. WE ARE AMERICANS; NOBODY WILL BE SAFE UNLESS WE TELL THEM 'NO' WE AIN'T GIVIN UP OUR GUNS OR OUR AMMO!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47826@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:14:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Retired Vet (December 28, 2008, 15:42:33)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47825</link>
<description>Assault weapons are not evil.  They are tools.  Tools can be used for good or for evil.  Knives killed 1,796 people in 2007.  Does that make knives evil and worthy of banning? Or are the abusers of these tools the evil ones? Laws cannot prevent evil doers from practicing their  trade. I dare say no rapist ever changed his mind about his crime because he suddenly realized it was against the law....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47825@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:42:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob (December 27, 2008, 17:27:45)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47798</link>
<description>What else would you expect from liberal politicians? Obama said he would sign the bill when it comes across his desk....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47798@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:27:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Afghan Veteran (December 27, 2008, 11:59:24)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47795</link>
<description>Gun sales are up 48%, 50% in Illinois.  Does this sound like the American people want gun control?  When voluntary gun turn-in amnesty programs see a 50% increase, I will believe Americans want gun control....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47795@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:59:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by 30 Year Army Man (December 27, 2008, 11:47:40)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47794</link>
<description>The government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular citizen.” In Bowers v. DeVito (1982), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, “[T]here is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.”  So much for police protection.  The FBI Crime Report for 2007 indicates that less than one percent of crime related gun deaths were caused by assault weapons.  More people were killed with knives, blunt objects, hands, etc.  Want to compare the number of assault weapon deaths to drunk driving deaths?  Maybe we should be banning alcohol....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47794@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:47:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mark smacker (December 26, 2008, 10:53:20)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47775</link>
<description>Mark feels threatened by armed americans.  Maybe he should.  Because if this goes the way he wants, HE will be the new game!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47775@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:53:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sniper By Nite (December 26, 2008, 03:01:30)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6257.html#47771</link>
<description>To: Mark
    Really, can't you do better than that? If your a gun hater and it sounds like you are, cant you do better than talking about a gun loving dead guy? Or are you so liberal that it makes you feel better to do so? Why dont you bash Tom Selleck? Or why dont you praise Rosie &quot;Fat Ass Lesbian&quot; O'donnel, shes a gun hater too! Go along with that crowd, you would fit in better....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47771@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:01:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		