<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for P.L. 110-360, The Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 2008</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by tedbohne (October 18, 2008, 09:40:43)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_PL_110-360.html#45222</link>
<description>i agree with 'entrench.'...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45222@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:40:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Entrench (July 11, 2008, 10:56:21)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_PL_110-360.html#38905</link>
<description>Normally I am against additional expenditure given our current volume of debt, however I view this as a necessary expenditure. Innovations in DNA technology greatly expand our ability to catch predators and other violent criminals. As a matter of fact it was the recent innovation of so called &quot;touch DNA&quot; that allowed us to finally clear the parents of Jon Benet Ramsey of any wrong doing....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38905@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:56:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		