<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 4930, The National Guardsmen and Reservists Parity for Patriots Act</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by howard bishop (December 10, 2008, 02:04:21)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_4930.html#47265</link>
<description>it would only be fair......</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47265@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:04:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by william llong (October 22, 2008, 23:01:41)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_4930.html#45409</link>
<description>this should be passed. i served in 03-04 in iraq we had it alot hard conditions then now. we deserve this. alos at my age it is getting hrder to keep up with army training...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45409@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:01:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Coldhill (September 2, 2008, 17:39:36)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_4930.html#41560</link>
<description>HR Joe Wilson and Senator Chambliss are true patriots for proposing HR 4920 and S2836 that reduce retirement eligibility for Guard and Reserve for active duty served 2001 to 2007. Those who served in Iraq and Afghanistan during this period deserve the same consideration of those serving in 2008 and beyond....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">41560@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:39:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jonathan Brazee (August 17, 2008, 19:30:54)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_4930.html#40416</link>
<description>This bill needs to be passed.  If Congress decided that the original bill was appropriate, then how can they justify that those who served before Jan 28, 2008 are somehow unworthy of the same consideration?  In Iraq, at least, the servicemen and women who served prior to Jan 28 served in a far more hostile, dangerous, and onerous environment than those who are serving now.  This is a slap in the face of all those who served prior to the date of eligibility....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40416@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:30:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		