<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 402, The Veterans' Disability Compensation Automatic COLA Act</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by bryan (October 14, 2008, 11:56:42)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_402.html#45054</link>
<description>we will b lucky to see 4%. it should be re-done under combat disability and not wefare social security.the cola rates should stand on their own...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45054@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:56:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim D. (September 22, 2008, 11:43:45)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_402.html#43642</link>
<description>The USA is taking 700 billion from the citizens to bail out incompetent companies.  Will our percentage really be 6.2, or higher, or what is really left?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">43642@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:43:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Wally (August 19, 2008, 14:51:15)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_402.html#40555</link>
<description>More that I will ever get from my civilian retirement plan. That would be &quot;0&quot; adjustment for cost-of-living....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40555@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:51:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Charlie (August 18, 2008, 13:25:23)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_402.html#40455</link>
<description>This year it looks like a COLA of close 6 percent. That is a better percentage than most folks will get in this economy....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40455@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:25:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JA Boyd (August 17, 2008, 16:31:48)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_402.html#40410</link>
<description>The military pay is not increased based on COLA. It is based on the budget recommendations and whatever Congress decides to give out. Basing it on CPI like Social Security is a better method....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40410@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:31:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Imo (June 17, 2008, 19:10:28)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_402.html#37628</link>
<description>Instead of an increase based on Social Securitys COLA, based the increase on the militarys' COLA....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37628@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:10:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jerry (November 10, 2007, 09:24:15)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_402.html#23016</link>
<description>What's not to like about this Bill ? Does Congress really need to make it look like there throwing us a bone every year waiting for them to approve our Cola. Give me a break....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">23016@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:24:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		