<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 3778, The HOMES Act</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim (December 17, 2007, 20:53:45)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3778.html#24828</link>
<description>After reviewing this bill I realized that the first person would have 150% of median. If 2 to 4 people were in the houshold the median income would be used.
Most people, except myself would file chapter 7 if we were below median income. You almost got me to believe you on this one. It covers absolutely no-one in chapter 13....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24828@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:53:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim (December 13, 2007, 23:20:08)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3778.html#24602</link>
<description>This bill does sound like it will help out people like myself who face loans which endanger their ability to restructure their mortgages and possibly completing a successful Chapter 13 plan, HR 3609 is written to address the problem to a higher degree and with less limitation. This legislation would possible help me deal with our situation and reduce the impact of the mortgage emergency for non-prime loans....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24602@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:20:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		