http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills info@washingtonwatch.com http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1 http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3327.html#46904 DOG FIGHTING RINGS DISTRIBUTE ILLEGAL WEAPONS, NARCOTICS-PROMOTES VIOLENT CRIME, TERROR & NATIONAL SECURITY RISK Dog fighting is now a national epidemic due to a poor economy. Though animal activists say it is a violation of a dogs' rights-it goes far beyond that-it violates the safety and even poses a NATIONAL SECURITY risk due to the distribution of cocaine and illegal weapons, including those firearms in the military--which may even include distributing bombs (remember these are violent criminals in these dog rings). DOG FIGHTING patronizes street gangs, *organized crime*, SKINHEADS, some members of the KKK, and violent criminals. These distributed guns are used in ARMED ROBBERIES-and ilicit drugs sold to our young. THAT is what the real issue is about in dog fighting--the distribution of instruments of such terror. Please keep our nation safe. Make this bill law.... 46904@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:10:06 EST http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3327.html#31351 kjasdl;fdskl... 31351@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:01:58 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3327.html#31314 i love animals this bill is soooo kewl. i agree with dog lover and people are only being fined so little... 31314@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:34:11 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3327.html#30262 Allowing Humane Societies to collect outrageous fees for seizing animals without a conviction of the owner and then taking ownership of the same animals, still without a conviction of the owner, is part of this bill that is designed to ensure the euthanasia of breeds, such as APBT, using the excuse of lack of space for adoptable dogs. As long as there is not conviction, there should be no charges levied,and, unless the animals are in clear danger, they should be left where they are and that person supervised with unannounced visits. If the fees charged by these AnimalControl agencies were reasonable and fair, which they never are, this matter would not amount to illegal confiscation of private property. Also, these private organizations should not be allowed to sue persons as it has been clearly shown that they target people based on breed, not the actions of the people. Again, a conviction should occur first.... 30262@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:28:11 EST http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3327.html#29300 Would like to hear some reasons why this bill shouldnt be made into law.... 29300@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:17:04 EST