http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills info@washingtonwatch.com http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1 http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3157.html#45764 Incomprehensible that there would be objection to the principle of the government compensating land owners for property it took from them. Are they indicating that they accept the taking by the government of private property without payment? This means that they would have no objections to a government entity taking some or all of their property.... 45764@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:02:34 EST