<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 3027, The Effective Law Enforcement through Transparent Interrogations Act of 2007</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Nanette White (August 11, 2007, 15:33:51)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3027.html#18571</link>
<description>Like the old saying a picture is worth a 1000 words-nothing like hearing the actual words made in an interrogation-It keeps all honest-It's fact that recording interviews will help to reduce wrongful convictions-It cuts both ways-Also aiding pol. agencies-It's common sense to have this law! It will keep the pol. honest in writing up reports re. interrogations/interviews-It also forces a defendant to stay w/ what was originally said during the interview-It also would aid to curb pol. abuse &amp; forced confessions during interviews-which is a contributing factor in wrongful convictions-None of us want to see innocent people wrongfully imprisoned-I was a witness in a felony case-I knew the investigator had lied in his prior reports about the facts of the interviews-I covertly recorded my interview-He then wrote up a false police report about mine-He blatantly lied in the report about extremely important facts about the case that showed the defendant's innocence-Kudos Mr. Ellison!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18571@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:33:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		