WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 297, The NICS Improvement Act of 2007

Comment by John Roane (January 14, 2008, 11:11:02)

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:11:02 EST

American Veterans aren't being afforded equal rights under this law. Therefore, this law is a clear violation of the US Constitution. You don’t even have to mention the second amendment....

Comment by Saint Jimi (June 22, 2007, 05:25:50)

Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:25:50 EDT

This is still America, a nation built on bullets and blood, a nation that still values the fighting spirit, that still values freedom above all else, a nation that will not be free so long as its people are unarmed....

Comment by Brian (June 14, 2007, 17:37:05)

Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:37:05 EDT

Dear "outdated", You use the age of the 2nd Amendment as a valid reason to abolish it. So by that same rationale, you must also believe that the ENTIRE Bill Of Rights should also be abolished, or as you U.N. sympathizing, one world government supporting, Marxist s**theads would prefer: "BANNED"!!!...

Comment by Joe (June 2, 2007, 02:45:06)

Sat, 02 Jun 2007 01:45:06 EDT

I must agree, "firearms disabilities" as classified by Congress and the ATF are a gross violation of our rights. This bill may not create any more restrictions and merely enforces those that already exist, but still that is wrong. I really do not believe that a person with any felony conviction should be barred from gun ownership for life. Next thing you know, a traffic ticket will disqualify you. Remain Vigilent-let your voice be heard!...

Comment by truth (June 1, 2007, 13:10:26)

Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:10:26 EDT

i couldnt agree more. but its really the jesuits who are behind gun control. and as you said the rapid decay of rights would be next. its all part of the jesuits new world order...

Comment by what the eff (May 25, 2007, 05:16:26)

Fri, 25 May 2007 04:16:26 EDT

test...

Comment by IGNORANCE (May 24, 2007, 14:25:57)

Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:57 EDT

Most people fail to realize that firearms held by law abiding citizens is a very powerful measure in both home defense and in keeping your power hungry gov in check. You take away the most efficient means to defend yourself and you are now completely powerless and are now a "subject" at the mercy of your government. It also sets in motion the rapid decay of the rest of your rights. We'd still be ruled by england if our citizens could not carry arms... learn from history and don't be ignorant. DC is a great example... took away guns and crime soared... only the criminals had the guns... how's the law abiding citizen supposed to defend themselves then?...

Comment by son-of-liberity (May 15, 2007, 02:25:21)

Tue, 15 May 2007 01:25:21 EDT

Harvey Wallbanger wrote: It failed because Virginia did not participate in the state voluntary federal database. Hey gun hating troll Harvey Wallbanger the bradybill background check failed to protect the students at VT. Gun hating troll Harvey Wallbanger since you want people held accountable for the death of people because of their actions, why not hold the gun haters accountable for pushing a gun control law that did not work....

Comment by to "florida" (May 2, 2007, 14:58:50)

Wed, 02 May 2007 13:58:50 EDT

taking away peoples guns is what the government will do anyway. but they will take everyones guns away not just the mentally ill, eventually. not one time in history has a government of a nation banned civilians from owning guns and a genocide not following. it just history repeating itself....

Comment by to "outdated" (May 2, 2007, 14:54:46)

Wed, 02 May 2007 13:54:46 EDT

holy f**k do you honestly beleive that the world is losing respect for the us because of its "right to bear arms"? No. its because of your evil and corrupt government. (bush)...

Comment by Florida (April 29, 2007, 21:59:51)

Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:59:51 EDT

The NRA has stated its support of this bill. We need to prevent another Columbine, Amish School, Vtech slaughter by the mentally ill. First, take the guns away while someone is mentally ill and, then, genuinely treat these people--not just until their ins runs out....

Comment by outdated (April 25, 2007, 16:14:55)

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:14:55 EDT

I do not understand why people are clinging to the archaic "right to bear arms". This is the 21st century! I am sad to see the world losing respect for The United States more and more everyday....

Comment by Flood Ctrl Dam 3 (April 23, 2007, 19:32:33)

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:32:33 EDT

>> How does the Brady Bill infringe on Militia's having access to firearms? When the last time you read the WHOLE 2nd Amendment?? << First, "the militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age..." (Title 10, chapter 13 of the United States Code). Second, the operative clause protects the right of the PEOPLE, not of the militia. Also, if you believe that prior restraint of free speech is unlawful (and that is the opinion of the Supreme Court), how is prior restaint of exercising your right to keep & bear arms not also unconstitutional?...

Comment by truth? (April 21, 2007, 10:04:33)

Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:04:33 EDT

Red: The brady bill needs not to be "improved" it is already an infringement on the 2nd Amendment. If any thing it needs to be DISCARDED! Wow! Where was this outrage on infringement on rights, when Bush issued his signing statements? Warrentless wiretaps opening mail reading email [except their own of course] Torture National Security Letters snooping into perhaps your bank account...

Comment by Sniperjoe (April 20, 2007, 18:10:33)

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:10:33 EDT

Umm read the second line blue, it clearly states that the PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms and that it can not be infringed...

Comment by BLUE (April 20, 2007, 15:24:23)

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:24:23 EDT

How does the Brady Bill infringe on Militia's having access to firearms? When the last time you read the WHOLE 2nd Amendment??...

Comment by RED (January 24, 2007, 02:32:17)

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:32:17 EST

This bill should not be passed!!! According to this if you have ever went to a therapis for any reason then you would never be able to own a firearm! The brady bill needs not to be "improved" it is already an infringement on the 2nd Amendment. If any thing it needs to be DISCARDED!...