<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 2898, The Judicial Conduct Act of 2007</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Maria 2 (March 14, 2008, 16:27:32)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2898.html#31442</link>
<description>Judicial discretion is another way of circumventing the laws. 
Judges were never intended to make the law, they were to rule (judge) according to the law....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">31442@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:27:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gordon V (January 8, 2008, 20:50:06)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2898.html#27410</link>
<description>We need judges that will interperet
the constitution not change it...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27410@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:50:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		