<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 2495, The Disabled Veterans Commissary and Exchange Store Benefits Act</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Marc (August 22, 2008, 02:22:59)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#40740</link>
<description>I am service connected, never served in combat, injured when my parachute malfunctioned and I think the imprint of my body is still on Fort Bragg 20 years later.

Personally I agree with Archie. I could care less about px priveleges. I am more concerned with having to drive 2 hours each way to get treated for my medical problems, and I really can not tolerate long car trips....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40740@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:22:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by V-Vet 68-69 (August 21, 2008, 20:04:33)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#40712</link>
<description>Can anyone help me so what rating does a veteran need to have now to us the commissary and what rating will this bill introduce?

I am presently rated at 100% what does this bill to do for with lower service connected injury....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40712@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:04:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by caiez (August 21, 2008, 14:00:43)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#40675</link>
<description>&quot;Deserve&quot; is a much overused word. You did not earn it. Seems like another one of those &quot;gimme gimme&quot; kinds of appeals....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40675@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:00:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Connie DeFehr (August 13, 2008, 02:54:34)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#40129</link>
<description>This is a no-brainer.  This is the least we can do....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40129@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:54:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JRH (August 12, 2008, 02:45:13)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#40053</link>
<description>Honorably &quot;Discharged&quot; Veterans Rated 100-percent Disabled by the Department of Veteran's Affair (VA).

Honorably discharged veterans (not entitled to retired pay), who are rated 100-per-cent disabled from a Uniformed Service-connected injury or disease, are entitled to a DD Form 1173 reflecting eligibility to commissary, exchange and MWR privileges only.  They receive their medical benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).  In order to receive an ID card, a letter from the VA must certify that the veteran is entitled to commissary and exchange privileges and indicate whether a medical reevaluation is necessary.  A copy of the DD Form 214 reflecting an honorable discharge is also required.  Letters from the VA that indicate the veteran has been awarded 100-percent disability compensation based upon unemployability are NOT acceptable. The member will be enrolled in DEERS as a DATUM or DAVPRM based on the letter from...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40053@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:45:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Archie (July 21, 2008, 11:36:58)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#39199</link>
<description>Dan ---- Honestly!!!! I am 100% Permanant and Total all combat wounds since wounded on Vietnams DMZ.  PX and commissary should be only for those wounded in combat and not for questionable disbilities. What has this country became a nation of wannabes? I think so!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">39199@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:36:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Theda (July 5, 2008, 15:10:25)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#38657</link>
<description>I can't understand why it should take so long, if was not for the miltary we would not have so many disabled veteran. I feel that disabled veterans rated a certain percentage should have access to the PX and Commissary. (Whats to think about)...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38657@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:10:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Robert (June 12, 2008, 20:11:01)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#37089</link>
<description>I can't believe this was the least
congress and the DOD could do,yet
they would bicker over it.

I'm surprised they even had to give it thought.

It sure seems logical to me.

Give the Vets something back for
their sacrifices.It doesn't really
even incur a cost.

Wow! the polititians could do something nice,that doesn't cost anything.

A real no-brainer!!!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37089@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:11:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by VETSETTER (June 5, 2008, 10:26:34)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#36405</link>
<description>FY09 Natoinal Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 5658) report states that the SecDef must supply a report of consideration for Disabled Veterans Access to Commissaries and Exchanges by the end of March, 2009. Looks like this won't even be considered until next congress....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">36405@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:26:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark (June 4, 2008, 16:49:06)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#36331</link>
<description>Maybe now we'll see what Mr. Obama really wants to get accomplished. Obviously, he has more on his plate, but this would go a long way to getting all vets behind him. This is SO OVERDUE and DESERVED...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">36331@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:49:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JoeCpl (April 28, 2008, 22:45:48)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#33316</link>
<description>I am a 70% disabled Vet from the
Vietnam War. I fought and bled for
my country; and I am refused
Military Base priviledges....I find
this hard to comprehend.
silver Star/purple heart Hue City...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33316@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:45:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by VETSETTER (April 28, 2008, 10:10:47)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#33254</link>
<description>I find it hard to see why the voting graphic at the top of this page has so many votes against it. Every comment on this board is in support of the resolution. Can someone please provide a good reason why NOT to pass this?! The weak arguments: 
It’d erode the benefit from retirees. Nonsense! They would have the same benefit. Those who gave their health should be given the same.
It’d negatively impact security on base. These veterans have already undergone screening &amp; served their country honorably. They weren't a security risk while on active duty.
It’d overload the infrastructure of the commissary and PX. Again; invalid! If you look at the number of retirees &amp; those who use this benefit, it is a small percentage. The price advantage is too small over stores such as Wal-Mart to benefit anyone but those who TRULY need it.
Call the House Armed Services Committee, Subcommittee on Military Personnel Staff line at (202) 225-7560 to let them know you'd like this to move forward!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33254@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:10:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jerry (April 24, 2008, 04:18:30)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#32881</link>
<description>This would provide even more ammunition to use against Congress when they propose cutting commissary benefits.  The extra money coming into MWR would also be most welcome.

All this for a group that earned the right through personal sacrifice to this great country.  What's wrong with Congress.  This is a no-brainer....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32881@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:18:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fred (April 21, 2008, 10:33:42)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#32690</link>
<description>Not to much to ask for from my perspective. We would still be giving back to MWR by shopping on base. May I say thank you to those in congress who have supported this bill....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">32690@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:33:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SFC Pugh (April 6, 2008, 13:30:15)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#31995</link>
<description>Disabled military should be given this service for their sacrifice to this great country. The volunteer spirit, they answered the call in their hearts to serve a higher need of this nation....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">31995@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:30:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joseph F. Kelly (March 31, 2008, 11:14:52)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#31814</link>
<description>Anyone with a service rated disability should have PX, Commissary privileges .With the cost of everything today and the price of fuel it would greatly help.Many Veterans would have to drive a considerable distance anyway .
everything today...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">31814@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:14:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joan (March 27, 2008, 11:24:33)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#31739</link>
<description>I will be praying for this to pass.  Anyone who has served in the military with any percentage of disability SHOULD be allowed to use the commissary/px.  We would be putting money into their pockets....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">31739@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:24:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by VETSETTER (March 17, 2008, 13:40:52)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#31493</link>
<description>WRITE YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AND CONGRESSPERSONS!

This bill shows merit and appears to have wide bipartisan support.  Unfortunately, DOD and some Veteran's organizations are lobbying against this bill's passage.  It has come up for the past 10 years and continues to languish in subcommittee.  Until we can get this passed through, it will not become a law....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">31493@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:40:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by 8 Years in a Row (March 13, 2008, 16:39:11)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#31421</link>
<description>Congress has no problem voting itself a pay raise for eight years in a row. Perhaps they should consider this....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">31421@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:39:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by 338.6 BILLION A YR FOR ILLEGALS (February 25, 2008, 10:26:47)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#30854</link>
<description>WHATS A FEW MILLION FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE FOUGHT IN WAR AND WORE THE UNIFORM. THIS ILLEGAL ALIEN MESS IS ASS BACKWARDS!!! WHAT IS AN ILLEGAL ALIEN? A MOVING TARGET!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30854@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:26:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DAV (February 25, 2008, 08:47:34)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#30851</link>
<description>PASS THIS BILL NOW PLEASE NOT 2YEARS FROM NOW...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30851@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:47:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DAL (February 25, 2008, 08:42:37)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#30850</link>
<description>I AM ASKING ALL DISABLED VETS TO WRITE TO YOUR GOVERNORS AND CONGRESSMEN AND EVEN THE PRESIDENT LETS TAKE A STAND THIS IS SOMETHING WORTH FIGHTING FOR JUST OUR BASIC RIGHTS TO PRIVELEGES WE DESERVE LETS QUIT JUST STANDING BY AND HOPING FOR A CHANGE LETS ALL BAND TOGETHER AND LET OUR VOICES BE HEARD THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF US LETS KEEP ASKING UNTIL WE GET WHAT WE DESERVE....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30850@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:42:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ALLEN (February 25, 2008, 08:28:33)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#30849</link>
<description>WE DISABLED VETS 100%UNEMPLOYABLE SHOULD RECEIVE THE SAME PRIVELAGES AS ANY ACTIVE DUTY SOLDIER AND IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRANGED 10 YEARS AGO INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR A BUNCH OF PEOPLE VOTING ON IT THAT HAVE EITHER NEVER BEEN IN THE MILITARY OR HAVE NEVER SEEN COMBAT WE DESERVE AND DEMAND WHAT SHOULD NOT EVEN HAVE TO BE ASKED FOR....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30849@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:28:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DAVID (February 25, 2008, 08:20:28)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#30848</link>
<description>WE CAN BECOME DISABLED FIGHTING FOR OUR COUNTRY BUT WE CANT USE COMMISSARY PRIVELAGES BECAUSE WE ARE HAS BEENS...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30848@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:20:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by david (February 25, 2008, 08:17:02)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2495.html#30847</link>
<description>we fought for our country now we are disabled and we cant even use the commissary privelages think about IT...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30847@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:17:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		