<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 1784, The PLEA Act</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Thomas (May 19, 2008, 21:23:25)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1784.html#35256</link>
<description>As a retired police officer, I would prefer to carry the Five SeveN (should I choose to carry), and with the production of any frangible bullet, would consider it's high capacity mag as a top reason for a self defense weapon....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35256@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:23:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian (October 24, 2007, 21:34:25)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1784.html#22450</link>
<description>This bill makes the assumption that if you buy one of these guns you have the sole intention of using it on an officer of the law. More paranoid moonbat nonsense!!!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22450@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:34:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Derek (May 10, 2007, 01:58:59)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1784.html#15532</link>
<description>It really shows that they know nothing about this weapon or the ammo that they want to ban. ss190 is available to LE only and is already classified as AP, and SS192 is no longer produced by the manufacturer....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15532@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:58:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		