<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 1762, To facilitate and expedite direct refunds to coal producers and exporters of the excise tax unconstitutionally imposed on coal exported from the United States</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by MT (May 20, 2008, 10:26:53)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#35288</link>
<description>This needs to be taken care of....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35288@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:26:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jms (May 19, 2008, 15:58:37)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#35230</link>
<description>Hopefully, the government will do what is right and refund some of this unconstitutionally collected money....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35230@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:58:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Victoria (May 16, 2008, 13:40:15)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34999</link>
<description>Our government can't just take money from businesses and then refuse to refund it.     This is so unfair....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34999@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:40:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sue (May 16, 2008, 12:54:01)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34995</link>
<description>This cannot go uncorrected.  The government must return these funds to the rightful owners. If the circumstances were reversed, there certainly would not be a debate about it....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34995@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:54:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dennis (May 16, 2008, 12:39:31)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34991</link>
<description>Hopefully, they will take advantage of this opportunity to right a wrong....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34991@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:39:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DL (May 16, 2008, 12:23:28)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34989</link>
<description>I continue to have trouble understanding why our government would not want to refund an unconstitutionally collected tax....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34989@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:23:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jeff Simmons (May 16, 2008, 10:46:38)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34976</link>
<description>This bill provides the government with an opportunity to correct an injustice and to serve the public at large by assisting an industry that provides half of the Nation's electrical energy needs....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34976@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:46:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill S (May 16, 2008, 10:26:57)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34973</link>
<description>I hope the government does the right thing.  Unconstitutional means unconstitutional....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34973@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:26:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lynn Smith (May 15, 2008, 12:01:56)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34898</link>
<description>I would hope our government would behave in a responsible manner and refund illegally collected tax monies in a timely manner...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34898@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:01:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kathryn (May 14, 2008, 20:31:16)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34861</link>
<description>I can't believe the government would profit by instituting an unconstitutional tax and not refunding it....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34861@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:31:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jake (May 14, 2008, 10:43:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34813</link>
<description>I believe that some of the Big Coal companies have been taken care of while the small companies that this bill would help heal have gotten a raw deal....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34813@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:43:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will S (May 13, 2008, 14:07:17)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34717</link>
<description>I operated a small coal company during the 90's.  We were barely a breakeven operation.  It makes me sick that the government can illegally take money out of my business and not pay me back.  I'm not a big coal company who can make up this later.  I provided jobs for 50 employees for over 10 years and have nothing to show for it.  It has been implied that I should have known that the tax was unconstitutional.  When people pay their taxes, they always assume that the government could not tax them illegally.  If we cannot assume this, then everyone needs to file a claim against the IRS every time they pay a tax just incase the tax is not constitutional....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34717@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:07:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by S. SMITH (May 12, 2008, 21:40:59)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34633</link>
<description>What reasons would the government possibly have NOT to refund an unconstitutional tax? If money was collected in such a manner, it should be refunded....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34633@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:40:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MT (May 12, 2008, 13:28:11)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34588</link>
<description>I cannot understand why anyone would be opposed to a bill that refunds money that the government illegally took.  People that are against this bill need to consider how they would feel if the government illegally taxed them.  This is not about coal; this is about our government being held accountable...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34588@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:28:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by D S (May 9, 2008, 11:09:11)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34340</link>
<description>How can the government justify collecting an unconstitutional tax and then not refunding it?  Would any of us want that precedent set? I know I do not....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34340@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:09:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim S (May 8, 2008, 14:24:05)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34251</link>
<description>The coal companies were even forced to pay penalties and interest if they failed to pay this unconstitutional tax....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34251@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:24:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Thomas (May 8, 2008, 13:57:41)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34248</link>
<description>Our Government is not above the constitution....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34248@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:57:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Craig (May 6, 2008, 20:43:46)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34040</link>
<description>The government should not be able to take money, call it a tax, and then be allowed to keep the money after the &quot;tax&quot; is declared unconstitutional....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34040@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:43:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sherri (May 6, 2008, 16:21:52)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#34014</link>
<description>It is extremely unfair of the government to collect an unconstitutional tax and then refuse to refund the money.  The federal government should not be able to take money from companies at will, leaving businesses with no recourse for recovering their losses....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34014@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:21:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jennifer Brown (May 6, 2008, 14:08:31)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#33997</link>
<description>How scary is it that the government could collect money in an unconstitutional manner, and then when called on it, still refuse to repay it?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33997@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:08:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michael (May 6, 2008, 13:26:01)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1762.html#33991</link>
<description>This was not a tax.  It was an unconstitutional taking of money from the coal companies that were struggling in the 80's and 90's.  This government does not debate the fact that this was an unconstitutional taking.  If this was oil companies that were illegally taxed, then I'm sure they would be compensated....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">33991@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:26:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		