<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 1009, The Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2007</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Rob (October 5, 2008, 02:59:15)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#44607</link>
<description>Doug, i agree one hundred percent with your statement. One problem though, this is about the drug as well. YES, I know the difference but you may have noticed the stipulation of 0.3 percent THC. Folks, that's a genetically modified strain.

We should not give the government complete control over the industrial, medicinal or recreational use of this plant. 

Every American should have the freedom to grow this &quot;plant&quot; for it's natural purpose... Fuel, Food, Fiber, Paper, Medicine and the SAFEST Recreational Drug known to man! DO NOT SETTLE FOR ANYTHING LESS!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">44607@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:59:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jeremy kushner (September 25, 2008, 14:18:50)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#43948</link>
<description>it is good for string and stuff...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">43948@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:18:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DJK (August 25, 2008, 11:25:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#40983</link>
<description>Like, FUEL!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40983@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:25:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lew Reed (February 17, 2008, 01:25:41)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#30623</link>
<description>Perfect comment, Doug. The essential truths. Truth in America has become so...politicized it's all mud. Follow the plight of this clear and thoughtful bill (HR 1009) to see just how muddied the truth can be....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30623@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:25:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Doug (February 9, 2008, 20:53:23)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#30300</link>
<description>&quot;Hemp is of first necessity....to the wealth and protection of the country.&quot; Thomas Jefferson (1791)

&quot;Make the most of the hemp seed and sow it everywhere.&quot; George Washington (1794)

We need this important crop back in American farms so Americans can once again use it's resources, as was done for hundreds of years.  Understanding hemp's enormous potential impact on many key industries very much supports the claim that the threat hemp posed back in the 1930s to special interests of natural resource companies (petroleum, plastics, timber and paper industries) accounts for its original ban. 

This isn't about drugs...it's about creating products (again) in a sustainable method....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30300@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:53:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Malcolm (October 6, 2007, 14:45:10)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#22020</link>
<description>Yes Hemp for Victory!  The reason people vote against hemp is because they are not educated in the wonderful benefits of it.  It is assumed that hemp and marijuana are the same thing, when actually they are very different.  Vote for HR 1009!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22020@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:45:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kathleen Ann (August 10, 2007, 19:14:58)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#18557</link>
<description>As an analogy, outlawing growing industrial hemp because it is a member of the cannibus family is rather like trying to outlaw potatoes because they are a member of the deadly nightshade family. It's utterly inane....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18557@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:14:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mary Ann (July 30, 2007, 02:19:23)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#18160</link>
<description>When I see people voting to not allow farmers to grow hemp, I really wonder who they are. It's almost like saying farmers can't grow wheat---although hemp is a superior crop to wheat and everything else. Hemp seed is the finest food of all....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">18160@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:19:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Paul Curtis (July 9, 2007, 11:29:21)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#16962</link>
<description>Hemp is good for fiber, cordage, clothing, land restoration, an alternative to clearcutting forests, and for the restoration of economically depressed rural areas including those needing alternatives to tobacco production. You can't go wrong with hemp... For Victory!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16962@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:29:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rand Clifford (June 29, 2007, 01:20:23)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#16760</link>
<description>Cannabis hemp is our greatest natural resource. The most valuable crop, the most useful plant...how anyone could say NO to the benefits of cannabis hemp...BOOO!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16760@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:20:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Paul J. von Hartmann (June 23, 2007, 10:58:54)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#16605</link>
<description>Cannabis &quot;hemp&quot; is a critically determinate natural resource, without which it may not be possible for our species to achieve sustainable existence within a functional Natural Order. Potentially the most abundant, globally-distributed agricultural crop, hemp was identified in Executive Order 12919 as a &quot;strategic food resource,&quot; available by &quot;essential civilian demand.&quot; Because Cannabis produces large quantities of monterpenes, which have been shown to slow global warming, the &quot;self-evident, god-given, natural right&quot; to grow hemp is beyond the rightful jurisdiction of any court....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16605@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:58:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by shawn (May 29, 2007, 20:52:52)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1009.html#16078</link>
<description>Legalize hemp!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16078@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:52:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		